Sunday 17 March 2024

Miss Waldron's Red Colobus: Who was R W Hayman who first described and named the monkey?

The man who named Miss Waldron's Red Colobus was Robert William Hayman of the Natural History Museum in London. Although his dates were not known at the time of writing of the Eponym Dictionary of Mammals in 2009, I see somebody must have found them since they do appear in articles online.

Hayman is an interesting case study of the organisation of science in Britain in the 20th century and of how it was possible for boys to rise to a position of leader in the field without being admitted to the full status of ‘scientist’.

Robert William Hayman was born on 11 November 1905 in Fulham, London, the son of James Hayman, a cheesemonger and then provision merchant born in Otterton, Devon, and his wife Eleanor Louise. He was one of nine children. The family lived at 6 Crondace Road, Fulham. Hayman was educated at Harwood Elementary School and then, from September 1917 until 22 December 1920 at Latymer Upper School.

On 29 December 1920, when the title of the establishment was British Museum (Natural History) and it was still controlled by the classicists of the Bloomsbury edifice, the London Gazette announced that Hayman, aged 15, was appointed ‘without competition’ as Boy Attendant. In the 1921 Census, a few months after he began work, possibly on 1 January 1921, he is living at home  in Fulham and shown as working as an ‘articulator’ at the Museum with Asst [Assistant] in brackets. In other words he was preparing skeletons for exhibition. The Census return also showed that he was in part-time education, probably some form of evening classes. In 1924 the London Gazette announced promotion to Attendant, again without competition.

The announcement of the most junior of jobs (male sorting clerk in the Post Office, for example) illustrates just how seriously employment at any level in the Civil Service was taken. Attendants did the menial jobs. In 1928 for the more senior and capable Attendants a new grade was introduced, Technical Assistant.  It was the latter who were encouraged to take on curatorial duties.

Hayman must have been highly regarded because we find him travelling First Class to Mombasa in  January 1930 on board the SS Adolph Woermann. The Smithsonian in Washington DC has information on what he was up to:

Photographs of a 1930 expedition to Uganda, Eastern Belgian Congo [Democratic Republic of Congo], and the Sudan to collect zoological and botanical specimens for the British Museum of Natural History. Approximately 240 photos, mostly labeled, on front and verso. A newspaper article about the expedition tipped in. Descriptions detail a combination of location and subject matter. Photographs depict terrain (coast lines of lakes and rivers), vegetation, specimens collected (wart hogs), candid images of local staffing (i.e. gun bearers, porters) and hunters, group portraits of "half-pygmies" from Ruwenziri mountains, members of expedition (some identified),and specimen preparation…

It was as a result of collecting during that expedition that his name was given to a species of tree mouse but Dendromus haymani is now considered a synonym of another species.

By 1935 Hayman was being given responsibility for working through collections in order to identify hitherto undescribed species and subspecies, and to name them. In his paper on the Lowe-Waldron collections he thanks Martin Hinton (1883-1961) for giving him the opportunity. Hinton was Deputy Keeper of the Zoology Department at the time and shortly to become Keeper. 

In the 1939 Register (the emergency census of 29 September just after the outbreak of war) shows Hayman was living at 16 Hackbridge Park Gardens, Sutton, Surrey, with another employee of the Natural History Museum and the latter’s sister. His occupation is shown as ‘Civil Servant Technical Work’ and in red ink has been added ‘Natural History Museum’. He was also a Volunteer in the Fire Service.

Hayman was also involved in the evacuation of preserved specimens from London to caves at Godstone, Surrey in 1941/42. He must also have taken part in the evacuation of dry specimens to a number of country houses from 1940: The mammals ended up in:  Huntercombe Place (later removed to Aston Rowant, Oxfordshire; Herriard Park, Hampshire; Red Rice, near Andover, Hampshire, and then Broughton Castle, Oxfordshire; Theddon Grange  and then Clatford Lodge, Hampshire; Althorp Park, Northamptonshire; Tattershall Castle, Lincolnshire; How Caple, Herefordshire; South Warnborough Lodge, Hampshire then to Swallowfield Park, Berkshire; Weston House, Bagshot, Hatton Hall, Ashney, Charlecombe, all at Bagshot and all all houses on Sir John Ellerman's estate. The logistics of doing all that in wartime do not bear thinking about.

Hayman can be seen from reports to have been active in various natural history societies around London and East Anglia.

In the postwar years Hayman was co-author of a number of major papers on mammals that were published from the Museum and is particularly remembered for his work on bats. The size of some of these works is remarkable. For example, the two volumes of The Families and Genera of Living Rodents written with the reclusive shipping line owner and devoted voluntary worker at the Museum, Sir John Reeves Ellerman (1909-1973) and George William Charles Holt (1897-1975), another technical assistant, ran to 1417 pages.

As well as these large works, Hayman commented more widely on issues of identification and taxonomy. One amusing example, published as a letter to Nature in 1957 (Rabbits in Africa, 179, 110) was the claim that the Rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, had been found living successfully living ‘within two degrees of the equator” in Central Africa—an account incorporated into the 1956 book on the rabbit by Harry Thompson and Alastair Worden in the New Naturalist series. The person who set that hare running (in a rare case of both literally and metaphorically) was Geoffrey Douglas Hale Carpenter (1882-1953) in a 1925 letter to Nature. Carpenter, a medical man and entomologist, became well known for his work on mimicry and the book he wrote with E.B. Ford in 1933. Carpenter claimed to have found a well-established colony of rabbits at Masindi, Uganda. Hayman wrote to put the record straight:

In 1928 Capt. C.R. S. Pitman, then game warden of Uganda, collected a series of rabbit-like animals at Masindi. He described them as being abundant along grassy roads at night. The specimens formed the basis of the description by J. St. Leger of a new lagomorph under the name Lepus marjorita. The characters of skin and skull separated it clearly from other hares and rabbits. Later, St. Leger raised the new species to generic rank, Poelagus, on the basis of skeletal characters. Later, St. Leger reported another race of P. marjorita from south-west Sudan, near the Belgian Congo border, and Hatt has recorded it from north-east Belgian Congo on the evidence of specimens collected in 1912. Superficially there is a resemblance to the European rabbit; but closer examination shows that its characters are perfectly distinct.

In view of these facts, it seems that Hale Carpenter's report of European rabbits in Uganda was based on a misidentification of Poelagus marjorita, and this misleading claim should now be rejected. 

Nature in 1953 carried the following news:

The Zoological Society of London, at the request of the Colonial Office, arranged a study-leave course during the month of September for selected members of the Colonial Service in Africa; those attending came from game, veterinary and forestry departments. The course was designed to help the members of those services who wish to do some serious work on the African fauna, particularly the mammals, but need some assistance and guidance in setting their steps in the right direction.

The course consisted of lectures, demonstrations and practical work; it included instruction on elementary anatomy and physiology, reproductive cycles, parasites, classification, ecology and the techniques of field-work. Prof. E. C. Amoroso (Royal Veterinary College) and Mr. R. W. Hayman (British Museum (Natural History)) collaborated with the Society's staff: it is hoped that similar courses will be arranged in future years.

Hayman was elected an honorary Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1963.

In 1947, those employed in the Natural History Museum were assimilated into the ‘Scientific Civil Service’. The senior staff (Keepers etc) were placed in the Scientific Officer Class, while the Technical Assistants were in the Experimental Officer Class. It was virtually impossible to move between the two classes. Thus, while being indistinguishable in terms of scholarship from a Scientific Officer, Hayman remained in the Experimental Officer class until he retired. However, what was remarkable about him was the seniority he achieved within that four-point class.

In his history, The Natural History Museum at South Kensington, published in 1981, William Thomas Stearn (1911-2001) wrote of Hayman (while getting his birth date wrong by two years): ‘…who joined the Department in 1921 as a Boy Attendant and who retired in 1967 as a Chief Experimental Officer’. A Chief Experimental Officer was a very rare beast indeed. Career Grade was two grades below (Experimental Officer) and promotion even to Senior Experimental Officer was difficult and unusual. Hayman must not only have been very highly regarded within the Museum itself but also by those on the external promotion and grading panels that controlled the promotion system.

Had Hayman retired 4 years later he would have found himself a Scientific Officer when the two classes were merged in 1971 as a result of the Fulton Report. He would have found himself a Principal Scientific Officer, the career grade for the former Scientific Officer Class.

Incidentally, it is somewhat paradoxical that dead animals in British museums are looked after by Curators under the direction of Keepers while live animals in zoos are looked after by Keepers under the direction of Curators.  The opportunities for solecisms by an unsuspecting visitor to the museum world are great. I was told the story of an animal dealer who took some frogs to the Museum to be identified. While there he reported to his friends ‘a bloke came in and said he was a Keeper. He had a lovely suit on. I don’t know how he could afford that on a keeper’s wages’.

ROBERT WILLIAM HAYMAN  FLS died on 25 February 1985. He was then living at 71 Mill Street, Ottery St Mary in Devon, eight miles from where his father was born.


Beolens B, Watkins M, Grayson M. 2009. The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hayman RW. 1935: On a collection of mammals from the Gold Coast. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London.1935, 915-937.

Wheeler A. 2000. The zoological collections of the British Museum (Natural History) - evacuation of the collections during the war years 1939-1945. Archives of Natural History 27, 115-122.


Wednesday 13 March 2024

Hong Kong: Male Asian Swallowtail

AJP sent this photograph of an uncommon butterfly he saw three weeks ago in a park in Kowloon Tong. It is a male Asian  Swallowtail, Papilio xuthus. Hong Kong is at the southern edge of its range in Asia. I have previously shown a photograph of a female he found in the same park in 2021.




Tuesday 12 March 2024

Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus. The Story Moves to the 1950s and Angus Booth


A visit to stay with a distant aunt in London always included time in Foyle’s bookshop on Charing Cross Road, which held as far  as I ever found the best selection of books on natural history at the time. There, in 1961, I found a new book by A.H. Booth Small Mammals of West Africa. It was in a series West African Nature Handbooks and had been published in 1960. It was at a price I could afford (not very much as a schoolboy with very little in his pocket) and I duly went through the bizarre process of paying. First, queue at the sales assistant’s counter. Hand over the book and be given a chit to take the one cashier’s counter on each floor. Queue again, pay, wait while the cash went through pneumatic tubes to a central office and the chit came backed stamped. Take the chit to the first counter. Queue gain and collect the book. Find the rackety lift surrounded by narrow grubby stairs and eventually find your way out of the shop. Amazon it was not.

On the back cover was printed the following paragraph: 

Angus Booth, the author of this book, was on the staff of the Department of Zoology at the University College of Ghana. He died suddenly and tragically shortly after completing the manuscript of this delightful book. His untimely death at the early age of thirty robbed the world of a brilliant young man, already recognised as one of the leading authorities on the mammals of West Africa.

and after his own Introductory chapter:

The reader will learn with sorrow of the sudden and tragic death of Angus Booth shortly after completing the manuscript of this delightful book. He was originally appointed general editor of the series and planned himself to write a companion book on the larger mammals. His untimely death at the early age of 30 not only stopped this work abruptly but robbed the world of a brilliant young man, already recognised as one of the leading authorities on the mammals of West Africa.

And that is all I knew of Angus Booth until I started my search for the identity of Miss Waldron. I found that Angus Booth had provided 26 specimens of the eponymous red colobus to the Natural History Museum, 7 in 1956 (6 from Ghana; 1 from Côte d’Ivoire) while 19 have the admission date of 1971 suggesting they were passed to the museum some years after his death.

I then found that Angus Booth was indeed a pioneer of primatology in West Africa, his work remembered in such comments as:

Before his tragic death at age 30, Angus Booth provided some of the earliest observations on West African monkeys in a series of influential papers.

As early as the 1950s the biologist Angus Booth warned that unless sufficient protective measures were taken, this monkey would become extinct in the near future.

Angus Booth of University College, Ghana, did sophisticated studies of synecology of west African primate communities in the early 1950s. Booth surely would have had a major influence on primate field research if he had not died tragically in 1959 [sic - 1958] at the age of 30.

In his later, classic paper on the zoogeography of West African primates, Booth (1958)…

Angus Herdman Booth was born on 1 September 1927 in Ashton under Lyne Registration District, Lancashire. In 1950 he married Cynthia Pamela Mary Knight in Cambridge. Both were Cambridge zoology graduates. A daughter was born in 1954 and a son in 1957. When travelling between UK and Ghana he gave an address in Southport, Lancashire, possibly that of his parents. I can no trace of him in the 1939 Register, the emergency census. Could the family have been abroad at that time or was he simply missed out?

Angus Booth, a Lecturer at University College Achimota died on 16 March 1958 at the Ridge Hospital Accra after what a note on a conference, of which he was the original secretary, in Nature, described as a short illness and having spent six years in Ghana (i.e. appointed in 1951 or early 1952).

While in Ghana Booth appeared in several newspaper accounts describing his work on monkeys but also in this one by Craven Hill, the Evening Standard’s Zoo Correspondent, which was syndicated throughout the country and taken up by the Londonderry Gazette of 2 September 1952.



Angus Booth did not confine himself to research on the primates. Papers appeared on geckos and on mammals in general. I have appended a probably incomplete list of Booth’s publications.

The story of the Booths does not end with the death of Angus in Ghana. This is from the Kenya Institute of Primate Research website:

The idea to start a primate research centre in Kenya was mooted in 1958 when Dr. LSB Leakey was visiting Ghana. He found that his friend…Angus Booth, had died very suddenly after about nine [six] years of primate research work in Ghana, which he had carried out jointly with his wife, Cynthia Booth. Both of them had been known to LSB Dr. LSB Leakey for a long time, and both were very highly qualified Cambridge University graduates in Biology and Animal Behavior. Dr. LSB Leakey enquired of Cynthia what she planned to do now that her husband had died, and she said that she would finish off the publication of their latest joint report, and wind current research, and then she would wish to leave Ghana. After pondering the matter for 24 hours, LSB suggested the next day that she should come and continue research on monkeys with a base somewhere near Nairobi. Accordingly, at the end of 1958 she arrived in Kenya, and the Tigoni Primate Research Centre came into existence.

Writing in 1983 James G Else wrote of the establishment:

The history of the IPR is a thorny one, beset with financial difficulties and other crises. The institute began, through the urging of Louis Leakey, as a private venture of Cynthia Booth, a zoology graduate of Cambridge, who had studied primates in Ghana for ·several years. The first outdoor enclosures were constructed on her 10-acre farm at Tigoni in 1960. Many of these cages and even some of the buildings were built by Cynthia Booth and Louis Leakey on weekends, to save money. 

In the early days, most of the work at what was then called the Tigoni Primate Research Centre involved collecting and maintaining a variety of primate species; research was restricted primarily to taxonomic studies. Kenyan independence resulted in a need for land for the resettlement of thousands of homeless people. Large areas of forest were cut down, resulting in the loss of habitats for many of the country's indigenous monkeys. Thus the major task of the fledgling institute was the collection of monkeys, particularly rare species. This was carried out as rapidly as the budget and construction of facilities allowed. 

Eventually the need for expansion made it clear that the Institute could no longer remain a private venture. In 1968, funds from the Munitalp Foundation were used to purchase a 20-acre plot half a mile from the original location. All the outdoor enclosures and 120 monkeys representing 12 species were moved to this new site and Cynthia Booth became the salaried director. During these formative years, Dr. Leakey managed to obtain financial support from a variety of sources, including the National Institute of Health, but there was never enough money to provide for more than basic care and feeding of the monkeys, a small staff and very modest research. In 1968 NIH discontinued its support of the IPR and Cynthia Booth resigned.

The only other information I have been able to find is that Cynthia remarried and died in Australia, in 2010 aged 80.

The Book: Small Mammals of West Africa

The illustrator was Clifford Lees. The only information I have on Lees is that he was a regular and frequent contributor to the Halifax Courier on natural history, illustrated by his own drawings. He was a member of the Halifax Scientific Society. I thought the illustrations to be excellent.

As I read the text I realised that Booth had kept a number of the animals he described, including monkeys. He thanked his wife, ‘who puts up with mammals around the house, and treats them as part of the family’.

He does not mention Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus by name because in dealing with the whole of West Africa, he dealt with it as one of the four subspecies of P. badius. I suspect he still would. He wrote:

They live in large troops, often of up to fifty monkeys. Their ability to leap is quite unrivalled, and most spectacular jumps are made from one tall tree to the next. A troop of Red Colobus is rarely silent. Their high-pitched ‘kyow’, a very bird-like sound, betrays even a resting troop. Moreover, their behaviour when hunted by Man is far from cunning. Hence these harmless and beautiful creatures are in danger of becoming extinct…The young are considered impossible to rear in captivity.

In this plate from the book, it is possible to see from the coloration of the hind limbs that Lees actually shows Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus of Ghana, as might be expected.




Angus Herdman Booth’s Scientific Publications


Booth AH.1954. A note on the colobus monkeys of the Gold and Ivory Coasts. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 12, 857-60.

Booth AH. 1955. Speciation in the Mona monkeys. Journal of Mammalogy 36, 434-49.

Booth AH. 1956. The Cercopithecidae of the Gold and Ivory Coasts: geographic and systematic observations. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 9th Ser. 9, 476-80.

Booth AH. 1956. The distribution of primates in the Gold Coast. Journal of the West African Science Association 2, 122-33.

Booth AH. 1956. An annotated list of the Gold Coast geckos with key. Journal of the West African Science Association 2, 134–136.

Booth AH. 1957. Observations on the natural history of the Olive Colobus Monkey, Procolobus vera (van Beneden). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1957, 421-430.

Osman Hill WC, Booth AH. 1958. Voice and larynx in African and Asiatic Colobidae. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 54, 309-321.

Booth AH. 1958. The Niger, the Volta and the Dahomey Gaps as geographic barriers. Evolution 12, 48-62.

Booth AH. 1958. The zoogeography of West African primates: a review. Bulletin de l'Institut Français d'Afrique Noire 20, 587-622.

Booth AH. 1959. On the mammalian fauna of the Accra Plain. Journal of the West African Science Association 5 26-36.

Booth AH. 1960). Small Mammals of West Africa. London: Longmans.

————————————


Finally, two more of Lees's plates from the book: 




Else JG. 1983 A national primate centre for Kenya. Kenya Past and Present 15, 35-39.



Sunday 10 March 2024

Blue-Shouldered Robin-Chat: a colour plate from 1952

In the days when colour printing was extremely expensive, the Avicultural Society had special appeals for funds to support the appearance in Avicultural Magazine of the occasional colour plate. A well-known bird artist was then commissioned. Although the whole run of the Society’s magazines can be found online, the plates rarely see the light of day. Therefore I decided to show one, now and again, on this site. This is the 17th in the series.

– – – – – – – – – –


The plate was the work David Morrison Reid Henry (1919-1977) in 1952. He signed his work as D.M. Henry and was an artist favoured by the Avicultural Society for the plates published in this period.

The accompanying note was by Cecil Stanley Webb (1910-1977) described by Geoffrey Marr Vevers as ‘one of the greatest animal collectors of all time’. Webb started collecting in 1919, reaching his heyday in the 1930s and 40s (after finding himself stranded on Madagascar during the Second World War). He became Curator-Collector for the Zoological Society of London, then Curator of Mammals and Birds. He then moved to Dublin Zoo where he was Superintendent. From then until his death he lived in Kenya.

Webb describes how where in West Africa (British and French Cameroons) and how he caught these birds (the one illustrated was one he brought to London in 1947); the 'how' can best be described as 'uncomfortably'.

The Blue-shouldered Robin-Chat (Cossypha cyanocampter) across a swathe of Africa in the following countries: Cameroon; Central African Republic; Republic of Congo; Democratic Republic of Congo; Côte d'Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea; Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Kenya; Liberia; Mali; Nigeria; Sierra Leone; South Sudan; Sudan; Tanzania;Togo; Uganda.

Avicultural Magazine Vol 58, 1952


Tuesday 5 March 2024

Hong Kong: Yellow-cheeked Tit

 AJP spotted Yellow-cheeked Tits (Machlolophus spilonotus) in the New Territories of Hong Kong last week. They are marked in the Hong Kong bird book as an uncommon resident, but also of captive origin. I am always suspicious of that latter label since the bird is known to occur across China not that far to the north. The habitat - mature woodland - would not have been available for many decades at least. Photographs from the early decades of the 20th century show a far more denuded landscape and with the use of anything for firewood during and immediately after the Japanese occupation, mature woodland was very sparse indeed. Re-introduction by artifical (i.e. the cage bird market) or natural (i.e. range expansion) means would seem a better term.

Whatever the origins of the present population, it is a stunning little bird.







Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus. Its role in understanding Yellow Fever

Willoughby Lowe in The End of the Trail noted that it was on their second visit to Goaso (i.e. during the 1934-35 expedition to Gold Coast) that blood samples were obtained from the specimens of monkeys they shot, including Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus. He wrote:

…the blood sample of the new monkey, brought home by my companion for Dr. Findlay, of the Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research.

The importance of this sample is that it contained antibodies to yellow fever, indicating that at some stage of its life it had been infected. Blood they collected from specimens of other species contained no antibodies against yellow fever.  Such research was a beginning to the understanding of the role of asymptomatic non-human primates as reservoir species for the virus in Africa and the complex interactions between populations of insect vectors, human and non-human primates.

Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus thus found its way into the classic texts on yellow fever.

Does Lowe’s mention of  Fannie Waldron ‘my companion’ indicate merely that she delivered the phials to Findlay or that she was responsible for their collection and treatment? Did, I wonder, Findlay have some sort of standing arrangement with the Natural History Museum, asking collectors to obtain serum samples from mammals living in yellow fever areas?

The two papers of interest by Findlay and several co-workers are behind an Elsevier paywall. However, the gist is that Findlay with collaborators from the Pasteur Institute in Paris and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine’s laboratory in Sierra Leone, in a preliminary papers published in the Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in January 1936, reported antibodies in a Chimpanzee, a baboon and the red colobus. A later paper showed that Findlay with a colleague at the Wellcome had obtained further blood samples from the Gold Coast, this time obtained by two medical men and George Soper Cansdale (1909-1993), then a forestry officer and part-time naturalist.

George William Marshall Findlay
Photograph by Bassano
Wellcome Collection

George William Marshall Findlay (1893-1952) was at the forefront of research on yellow fever in the British Empire. While a medical student in Edinburgh he immediately volunteered as a medical assistant with the Belgian Army. For that he received an award from Belgium in 1914. He then graduated in 1915 and on 24 December was commissioned as ’temporary Surgeon in His Majesty’s Fleet’ in the words of the London Gazette. After the war, he held medical research fellowships and was then appointed as assistant pathologist to the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary. In Edinburgh he acquired both an MD to (with gold medal), and a DSc. (there was no PhD then, and the DSc in Scottish universities was very different to that awarded today). After a spell at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund he joined  the Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research and began research into tropical viral diseases, including yellow fever in the field in Gambia. He wrote Advances in Chemotherapy in 1930, that term being used for chemical treatment of all diseases, infectious as well as non-infectious. During the second world war he was brought into the Royal Army Medical Corps to investigate yellow fever in Sudan and trench fever in Tunis and by 1942 was a Brigadier in the West Africa Command.

Findlay received civil honours for his work on yellow fever. He left Wellcome in 1948 to join the staff of the British Medical Association to become editor of two abstracting journals: Abstracts of World Medicine and Abstracts of World Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. He had wide interests including microscopy and in 1950 was elected became President of the Royal Microscopical Society. 

Findlay GM, Stefanopoulo GJ, Davey TH, Mahaffy AF. 1936. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 29, 419-424.

Findlay GM, MacCallum FO. 1937. Yellow fever immune bodies in the blood of African primates. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 31, 103-106.



Friday 1 March 2024

Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus. The Lowe-Waldron specimens were NOT the first to reach London’s Natural History Museum

 

From McGraw 2005

Willoughby Lowe’s entry in the Eponym Dictionary of Mammals has a couple of unkind sentences:

He is also notorious for having shot eight specimens of Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus Piliocolobus badius waldroni in Ghana in 1933…The colobus was already rare and is now thought to be extinct. 

There is no evidence that in the 1930s where suitable forest remained the red colobus it was rare. Indeed in the 1970s large troupes were observed. Lowe did warn—correctly—that further loss of forest would have devastating effects on it and other species. In addition, providing series of specimens was exactly what the Museum instructed collectors to do since it was realised that it is important to study variation between individuals from the same location. Lowe’s specimens (12, not 8, are shown in the catalogue) were joined later by 26 collected by Angus Booth (1927-1958) (on whom more in a future article) who was warning even more vociferously about the dangers of deforestation which was proceeding apace and the ease of hunting the red colobus for meat.

Willoughby Lowe clearly believed that he and Fannie Waldron had discovered the monkey named for Miss Waldron. However, looking at the catalogue of the Natural History Museum that was not the case. Two had arrived more than 20 years earlier.

The job of sorting the collection of mammals brought back by Lowe and Waldron in 1934 and 1935 from the Gold Coast (Ghana) was given by Martin Hinton, who was in charge of mammals, to Robert William Hayman (1905-1985). Hayman made a mistake in the introduction to his paper. He had just Lowe on the 1933-34 expedition with Miss Waldron also present in 1934-35. That is incorrect. Waldron and Lowe travelled together on both.

Hayman named the red colobus as a new subspecies, Colobus badius waldroni. In his description he compared these specimens from Goaso with the nominate subspecies:

A red Colobus closely related to the Liberia and Sierra Leone form, Colobus badius badius Kerr, but differing in the distribution of the black in the pelage. In true badius the black extends from the front of the forehead back over head, neck, shoulders, and upper arms, all the back, and thence on to the outer side of the thighs as far as the knee. The black on the outside of the thighs extends behind to meet the white perineal area. The tail is dark reddish on the basal half, darkening to black on the apical half.

In this new Gold Coast race a series of eleven specimens (six adult male skins and skulls and one immature male, three adult female skins and skulls, and one adult female in alcohol) shows the following constant differences:—The forehead is dark red, deepening on the crown to black. The black either does not extend to the thighs at all, as in the majority, or, at most, as in one specimen goes no further than part way down the centre of the outside of the thigh, not passing behind to the back of the thigh. The tail is jet-black above and below throughout.

One of the males, represented by a skin and skull was chosen as the type (holotype) for the new subspecies: ‘Collected at Goaso, Ashanti, December 31, 1933, by  Willoughby P. Lowe’

Hayman went on to note:

The whole series exhibits little variation in colour. In one female skin the thighs have a thin median streak of blackish brown quite narrow, and the back of the thigh is broadly red, as is the whole of the thigh in the rest of the series. In the British Museum Collection is a very young skin from Bibianaha [Bibiani], Gold Coast (Spurrell, 12.6.20.1), which exhibits all the characters of this race with the sole exception of the tail, which is mainly reddish below, although completely black above from root to tip.

I have much pleasure in connecting with this remarkably handsome discovery the name of Miss Waldron, who contributed much to the success of the expedition.

The specimens collected by Spurrell in 1912 are currently listed in the catalogue as Colobus (Piliocolobus) badius waldroni.

Hayman must have realised that Spurrell’s red colobus was of the same subspecies he had described from the new series of specimens. Bibiani is less than 30 miles from Goaso.

Thus we have a situation in which the name of the original collector was overlooked as an eponym. I can see two or three reasons why one of the later specimens was selected as the type and why Miss Waldron’s name was chosen. The greater range of adult males and females brought back by Lowe and Waldron enabled a greater certainty of separation from the nominate subspecies. Secondly, I suspect museum employees were told when possible to honour Fannie Waldron the best they could. Money was very tight in the 1930s. Grateful thanks and recognition may have brought funding for further trips from Miss Waldron. She had at least part-funded the first expedition and probably wholly funded the second. A fish, a bird and a mammal were duly named. Thirdly, Spurrell (Herbert George Flaxman Spurrell, 1877-1918, on whom more in a later article) was dead.


This excellent comparison is from McGraw (2005)

In terms of taxonomy, Reginald Innes Pocock (1863-1947) changed the generic name in the paper that followed immediately on from Hayman’s in Proceedings of the Zoological Society. As can be seen it was Pocock (working on mammals in the Natural History Museum after retiring as Superintendent of London Zoo) who asked Lowe to bring back a specimen preserved in spirit from the second expedition:

On his return in 1934 from the first of his two recent expeditions to Ashanti, Mr. Willoughby Lowe informed me that he had shot female examples of the Red Colobus (Procolobus badius waldroni) showing a swelling of the external genitalia which he had never previously observed in any representatives of this genus. The swelling in question, obviously similar in its nature to that of Baboons (Papio), Mangabeys (Cercocebus), and of some species assigned to Macaca, was clearly indicated, although in a shrivelled and otherwise distorted condition in two of his dried skins. Since the phenomenon in question had apparently never been described, or even recorded, in any representative of this family of Monkeys, I begged him, before starting on his second expedition to the same district, to bring back, if possible, a specimen of this monkey preserved in alcohol or formalin. To his kind acquiescence in this request I owe the opportunity of describing and figuring not only the catamental swelling in question, but other external characters of a Red Colobus for the most part previously known only from dried skins. A comparison of the characters with those of examples of the Black and White Colobus Monkeys recorded in my paper on the external characters of the Catarrhine Monkeys (Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond, 1926, pp. 1479-1579) suggests that the two main divisions of these monkeys may be generically distinguished; and since the name Colobus belongs primarily to the "Black and White" section, typified by polykomos (=ursinus), the red section may be provisionally assigned to Procolobus, its oldest available name, with verus van Bren. as the the type species.

Rochebrune…also proposed the generic name Piliocolobus for one or two different kinds of "red " species, and Allen selected badius as the type. It remains to be seen if there are generic differences between Procolobus and Piliocolobus.

Fast forward to 2024 and the accepted generic name is Piliocolobus.

Hayman’s retention of Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus in the species now known as Piliocolobus badius, but as a new subspecies, seems entirely reasonable since there is a series of red colobus forms along the forest regions of West Africa which have become delineated by river systems and geological features. However, it was inevitable given the species concepts being employed on some groups of mammals in the latter part of the 20th century and beyond that P. badius would be split. Thus we have Piliocolobus waldroni (or infuriatingly so as to supposedly agree with the rules of nomenclature on using the correct gender of the latin genitive eponym in specific names, Piliocolobus waldronae. That stupidity seems to have been stopped but it is under that name that the species is described in the Primate volume of Handbook of the Mammals of the World published in 2013. Equally infuriating is the fact that the ‘split’ was based on the mitochondrial genome of a single individual. As an aside, I do find it amazing that in no other branch of science are decisions made by one individual or school of thought so readily accepted as gospel by others in essentially the same field. While there may be a little to and fro, by and large and for a time at least, the new designation is just accepted.

Becoming bogged down in arcane taxonomic niceties does not answer the pressing question of whether any of Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus remain alive. The devastating losses caused by destruction of its forest habitat and by hunting for human food have been such that the species has, after searches, been declared extinct but for that conclusion to be challenged after local hunters across the border in the Tanoé Swamp Forest of Ivory Coast (Côte d’Ivoire) have claimed to have seen it, to know its call, and have produced skins as evidence. However, there seems to have been no further positive news in the past 15 years. The IUCN Red List (where it is listed as a species) has it as ‘Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct)’. Whether it is a true biological species or a form of P. badius is immaterial to the conservation message: when you lose habitats you lose their inhabitants. The whole ecosystem (for want of a better, non-teleological, term) is gone. The history of how this came about was outlined in a paper by Oates, Struhsaker & Whitesides in 1997:

Three subspecies of forest primate are known only from southwestern Ghana and parts of neighboring Côte d'Ivoire to the east. These are the white-naped mangabey (Cercocebus atys lunulatus), the Roloway guenon (Cercopithecus diana roloway), and Miss Waldron's red colobus (Procolobus badius waldroni)…The rainforest area where these endemic primates occur has undergone very rapid development since World War II. Logging activity has been more intense than in almost any other part of tropical Africa, and many people have moved into the region to cultivate the land as it has been opened up. Logging, farming and human population growth in the region have been accompanied by the increased hunting of wild mammals and larger birds for meat, much of which has been traded out of the immediate area for sale in towns.


Beolens B, Watkins M, Grayson M. 2009. The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Hayman RW 1935. On a collection of mammals from the Gold Coast. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1935, 915-937.

McGraw WS. 2005. Update on the search for Miss Waldron’s Colobus monkey. Internatikonal Journal of Primatology 26, 605-619.

Oates JF, Struhsaker TT,  Whitesides GH. 1996/97. Extinction faces Ghana's Red Colobus monkey and other locally endemic subspecies. Primate Conservation (17), 138-144.

Pocock RI. 1935. The external characters of a female Red Colobus Monkey (Procolobus badius waldroni). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1935, 939-944.